சித்தரெலாம் கூடிநின்றா ரெங்கே யெங்கே
பக்தரெலாம் கண்மூடிப் பார்த்தா ரங்கே
வித்தகர்கள் வழி காட்டும் வித்தை யெங்கே
புத்தகங்க ளேபுரட்டிப் புலம்ப லங்கே
cittarellaam koodinindraa engae engae
paktarellaam kaNmoodi paarthaa rangae
vittakarkaL vazhi kaattum vittai engae
puttakangka Laepurattip pulampa langae
“Where, where have all the Siddhars gathered and stood?
The devotees, closing their eyes, saw (them) there.
Where is the skill/technique by which the masterly ones show the path?
There, people lament while merely turning over books.”
“You ask where the Siddhars are: they are ‘there’—in the inner place revealed when the eyes are shut and attention turns inward. The real ‘art’ is the hidden method by which the accomplished guide the seeker into that seeing. If one only flips through texts, one remains in complaint and longing rather than realization.”
The verse contrasts two ways of seeking: (1) inward, practice-based seeing and (2) outward, text-based searching. “Closing the eyes” points to pratyāhāra/dhyāna—withdrawal from sensory dispersion into an interior locus where vision becomes subtle (often implied as the “inner eye,” the brow-center, or the heart-space). The repeated “Where, where?” is the seeker’s habitual outward question, while the answer “there” quietly redirects the location from geography to inner experience.
“Siddhars gathered” can be read as perfected beings assembling in a subtle realm, but also as siddhi-states/powers “converging” when mind and prāṇa become unified. In many Siddha frames, when vāyu (breath/prāṇa) is made to stand in a central channel or still point, the scattered faculties collect; the ‘assembly’ is an image for this convergence.
The “skill/technique shown by the adept ones” (vittai) hints at an esoteric method—often transmitted orally—such as breath-regulation, mantra, nāḍi-work, kuṇḍalinī processes, or a coded alchemical-yogic discipline. Siddha literature frequently implies that books contain clues but not the living key; without embodied practice and competent guidance, one “turns pages and laments,” accumulating concepts while the promised experience remains absent. The critique is not of texts per se, but of substituting textual agitation for transformative sādhanā.